Transfer of Custody (Q659): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: has external origin (P1): http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E10_Transfer_of_Custody, Modified using wikibase-api for Python) |
(Added qualifier: language (P2): en, Modified using wikibase-api for Python) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Property / type | |||
| Property / type: Class / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / subClassOf | |||
| Property / subClassOf: Activity / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / comment | |||
This class comprises transfers of physical custody of objects between instances of E39 Actor. The recording of the donor and/or recipient is optional. It is possible that in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody there is either no donor or no recipient. Depending on the circumstances it may describe:1. the beginning of custody 2. the end of custody 3. the transfer of custody 4. the receipt of custody from an unknown source5. the declared loss of an objectThe distinction between the legal responsibility for custody and the actual physical possession of the object should be expressed using the property P2 has type (is type of). A specific case of transfer of custody is theft.The interpretation of the museum notion of "accession" differs between institutions. The CRM therefore models legal ownership and physical custody separately. Institutions will then model their specific notions of accession and deaccession as combinations of these. | |||
| Property / comment: This class comprises transfers of physical custody of objects between instances of E39 Actor. The recording of the donor and/or recipient is optional. It is possible that in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody there is either no donor or no recipient. Depending on the circumstances it may describe:1. the beginning of custody 2. the end of custody 3. the transfer of custody 4. the receipt of custody from an unknown source5. the declared loss of an objectThe distinction between the legal responsibility for custody and the actual physical possession of the object should be expressed using the property P2 has type (is type of). A specific case of transfer of custody is theft.The interpretation of the museum notion of "accession" differs between institutions. The CRM therefore models legal ownership and physical custody separately. Institutions will then model their specific notions of accession and deaccession as combinations of these. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / comment: This class comprises transfers of physical custody of objects between instances of E39 Actor. The recording of the donor and/or recipient is optional. It is possible that in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody there is either no donor or no recipient. Depending on the circumstances it may describe:1. the beginning of custody 2. the end of custody 3. the transfer of custody 4. the receipt of custody from an unknown source5. the declared loss of an objectThe distinction between the legal responsibility for custody and the actual physical possession of the object should be expressed using the property P2 has type (is type of). A specific case of transfer of custody is theft.The interpretation of the museum notion of "accession" differs between institutions. The CRM therefore models legal ownership and physical custody separately. Institutions will then model their specific notions of accession and deaccession as combinations of these. / qualifier | |||
language: en | |||
Latest revision as of 23:21, 27 November 2024
No description defined
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Transfer of Custody |
No description defined |
Statements
This class comprises transfers of physical custody of objects between instances of E39 Actor. The recording of the donor and/or recipient is optional. It is possible that in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody there is either no donor or no recipient. Depending on the circumstances it may describe:1. the beginning of custody 2. the end of custody 3. the transfer of custody 4. the receipt of custody from an unknown source5. the declared loss of an objectThe distinction between the legal responsibility for custody and the actual physical possession of the object should be expressed using the property P2 has type (is type of). A specific case of transfer of custody is theft.The interpretation of the museum notion of "accession" differs between institutions. The CRM therefore models legal ownership and physical custody separately. Institutions will then model their specific notions of accession and deaccession as combinations of these.
en
0 references