is in mapping relation with (P63): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created claim: comment (P5): These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model...) |
(Added qualifier: language (P2): en, Modified using wikibase-api for Python) |
||
Property / comment: These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice. / qualifier | |||
language: en |
Revision as of 23:12, 27 November 2024
No description defined
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | is in mapping relation with |
No description defined |
Data type
Item
Statements
Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings
en
0 references
These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.
en
0 references